Post-settlement
The portfolio review you should run every 12 months
Rents, equity, structure, costs and goal-fit — the questions that compound in your favour.
Most investors buy a property and then forget it exists until tax time. The compounding cost of that habit is enormous. A 60-minute annual review, done properly, is worth more than most people’s next purchase.
The five questions, in order
Where the upside actually comes from in a typical year
Estimated $ value uncovered per property
1. Rent — is it actually at market?
Your property manager is incentivised to keep tenants, not to maximise rent. A formal CMA every 12 months — with a polite notice if needed — almost always finds 4–8% slippage.
2. Equity — is it stuck or working?
Equity sitting unused is a tax on your own balance sheet. The review asks: can it be released, into an offset, against the next deposit, or held as a buffer?
3. Structure — has the goal moved?
Marriage, business income, kids, super contributions — every one of these can change the optimal ownership structure. Most reviews uncover one structural change worth making before the next purchase.
4. Costs — what is leaking?
Insurance premiums creep. PM fees creep. Loan rates drift above market. None of these line items are big alone. Together they are the difference between a positively and negatively geared portfolio.
5. Goal-fit — is this still the right asset?
Sometimes the answer is: sell. Not often. But the review is the only place that question gets asked honestly.
A property is not a set-and-forget asset. It is a small business with one customer and one product. Treat it that way.
Go Deeper
Free guides related to this article
Get in touch
Ready for a goal-based property strategy?
Book a no-obligation strategy call. We’ll listen first, then tell you whether property is the right tool for your goal — and which strategy fits.